Improving the cost effectiveness equation of cascade testing for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH)

Purpose of Review : Many International recommendations for the management of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) propose the use of Cascade Testing (CT) using the family mutation to unambiguously identify affected relatives. In the current economic climate DNA information is often regarded as too expensive. Here we review the literature and suggest strategies to improve cost effectiveness of CT. Recent findings : Advances in next generation sequencing have both speeded up the time taken for a genetic diagnosis and reduced costs. Also, it is now clear that, in the majority of patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH where no mutation can be found, the most likely cause of their elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is because they have inherited a greater number than average of common LDL-C raising variants in many different genes. The major cost driver for CT is not DNA testing but of treatment over the remaining lifetime of the identified relative. With potent statins now off-patent, the overall cost has reduced considerably, and combining these three factors, a FH service based around DNA-CT is now less than 25% of that estimated by NICE in 2009. Summary : While all patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH need to have their LDL-C lowered, CT should be focused on those with the monogenic form and not the polygenic form

Public Awareness of Genetic Influence on Chronic Disease Risk: Are Genetic and Lifestyle Causal Beliefs Compatible?

Background/Aims: There is concern that raising awareness about the role of genetics in chronic disease etiology could undermine public belief that lifestyles are important, leading to adverse effects on public health. We tested the hypothesis that people who believe genetics influence chronic disease risk are less likely to believe lifestyles play a role. Methods: Open-ended questions about cancer and heart disease risk factors were included in a population-based survey of 1,747 British adults. Responses were coded for causal beliefs about genetics and lifestyle (smoking, diet, alcohol, exercise). Results: One third of the respondents identified genetic factors as influencing cancer (35%) and heart disease (36%) risk. Identifying genetic risk was associated with female gender, older age and education for both diseases, as well as with family history for heart disease. Individuals identifying genetic influences on cancer risk were more likely to identify diet (p < 0.001) and exercise (p < 0.05), and mentioned more lifestyle factors overall (p < 0.05), independent of demographics and family history. Patterns were similar for heart disease. Conclusion: People who recognize that genetics influence chronic disease risk appear more, not less, likely to recognize the role of lifestyles, contradicting suggestions that the public takes an 'either/or' view of the etiology of these potentially preventable diseases. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Base

Management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in childhood

Purpose of review : All guidelines for the management of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and young people recommend statins to lower LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations, to reduce the individual's adult risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Here, we review recent findings regarding the efficacy and safety of the use of stains in childhood. Recent findings : As expected from their safety profile in adults, there is no evidence from short-term trials or long-term follow-up that statin use in children is associated with any adverse effects on growth, pubertal development or muscle or liver toxicity. Long-term follow-up indicates benefits with respect to lower CVD rates. Factors that influence adherence are discussed, as is the role of the underlying genetic causes for hypercholesterolaemia and of variation at other genes in determining the LDL-C-lowering effect. Summary : Based on the good safety profile, and the expert opinion guidelines, clinicians should consider prescribing statins for children with hypercholesterolaemia from the age of at least 10 years (and earlier if CVD risk is particularly high in the family). Uptitrating statin dosage and the use of additional lipid-lowering therapies should be considered so that LDL-C concentrations are lowered to recommended targets

Genetic determinants of the response to bezafibrate treatment in the lower extremity arterial disease event reduction (LEADER) trial.

Genetic determinants of baseline levels and the fall in plasma triglyceride and fibrinogen levels in response to bezafibrate treatment were examined in 853 men taking part in the lower extremity arterial disease event reduction (LEADER) trial. Three polymorphisms in the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) gene were investigated (L162V, G>A in intron 2 and G>C in intron 7), two in the apolipoprotein CIII (APOC3) gene (-482C>T and -455T>C) and one in the beta-fibrinogen (FIBB) gene (-455G>A). The presence of diabetes (n=158) was associated with 15% higher triglyceride levels at baseline compared to non-diabetics (n=654) (PC substitution. In the non-diabetic patients, the PPARalpha V162 allele was significantly associated with 9% higher baseline triglyceride levels (P<0.03) and a similar, but non-significant trend was seen for the intron 7 polymorphism. Overall, triglyceride levels fell by 26% with 3 months of bezafibrate treatment, and current smokers showed a poorer response compared to ex/non-smokers (23% fall compared to 28% P=0.03), but none of the genotypes examined had a significant influence on the magnitude of response. Carriers of the -455A polymorphism of the FIBB gene had, as expected, marginally higher baseline fibrinogen levels, 3.43 versus 3.36 g/l (P=0.055), but this polymorphism did not affect response to treatment. Overall, fibrinogen levels fell by 12%, with patients with the highest baseline fibrinogen levels showing the greatest decrease in response to bezafibrate. For both the intron 2 and the L162V polymorphisms of the PPARalpha gene there was a significant interaction (both P<0.01) between genotype and baseline levels of fibrinogen on the response of fibrinogen levels to bezafibrate, such that individuals carrying the rare alleles in the lowest tertile showed essentially no overall decrease compared to a 0.18 g/l fall in homozygotes for the common allele. Thus while these genotypes are a minor determinant of baseline triglyceride and fibrinogen levels, there is little evidence from this study that the magnitude of response to bezafibrate treatment in men with peripheral vascular disease is determined by variation at these loci

Cost effectiveness analysis of different approaches of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia

Objectives To assess the cost effectiveness of strategies to screen for and treat familial hypercholesterolaemia. Design Cost effectiveness analysis. A care pathway for each patient was delineated and the associated probabilities, benefits, and costs were calculated. Participants Simulated population aged 16­54 years in England and Wales. Interventions Identification and treatment of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia by universal screening, opportunistic screening in primary care, screening of people admitted to hospital with premature myocardial infarction, or tracing family members of affected patients. Main outcome measure Cost effectiveness calculated as cost per life year gained (extension of life expectancy resulting from intervention) including estimated costs of screening and treatment. Results Tracing of family members was the most cost effective strategy (£3097 (&5066, $4479) per life year gained) as 2.6 individuals need to be screened to identify one case at a cost of £133 per case detected. If the genetic mutation was known within the family then the cost per life year gained (£4914) was only slightly increased by genetic confirmation of the diagnosis. Universal population screening was least cost effective (£13 029 per life year gained) as 1365 individuals need to be screened at a cost of £9754 per case detected. For each strategy it was more cost effective to screen younger people and women. Targeted strategies were more expensive per person screened, but the cost per case detected was lower. Population screening of 16 year olds only was as cost effective as family tracing (£2777 with a clinical confirmation). Conclusions Screening family members of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia is the most cost effective option for detecting cases across the whole population

Does angiotensin-1 converting enzyme genotype influence motor or cognitive development after pre-term birth?

BACKGROUND: Raised activity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may both amplify inflammatory and free radical responses and decrease tissue metabolic efficiency and thus enhance cerebral injury in the preterm infant. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) DD genotype is associated with raised ACE and RAS activity as well as potentially adverse stimuli such as inflammation. The DD genotype has been associated with neurological impairments in the elderly, and thus may be also associated with poorer motor or cognitive development amongst children born preterm prematurely. METHODS: The association of DD genotype with developmental progress amongst 176 Caucasian children born at less than 33 weeks gestation (median birthweight 1475 g, range 645–2480 g; gestation 30 weeks, range 22–32; 108 male) was examined at 2 and 5 1/2 years of age. Measured neuro-cognitive outcomes were cranial ultrasound abnormalities, cerebral palsy, disability, Griffiths Developmental Quotient [DQ] at 2 yrs, and General Cognitive Ability [British Ability Scales-11] and motor performance [ABC Movement], both performed at 5 1/2 yrs. All outcomes were correlated with ACE genotype. RESULTS: The DD genotype was not associated with lower developmental quotients even after accounting for important social variables. CONCLUSION: These data do not support either a role for ACE in the development of cognitive or motor function in surviving infants born preterm or inhibition of ACE as a neuroprotective therapy

Cardiovascular risk stratification in familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common autosomal-dominant disorder in most European countries. Patients with FH are characterised by a raised level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and a high risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Currently there is no consensus regarding the clinical utility to predict future coronary events or testing for the presence of subclinical atherosclerotic disease in asymptomatic patients with FH. Family screening of patients with FH as recommended by the UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline would result in finding many young individuals with a diagnosis of FH who are clinically asymptomatic. The traditional CHD risk scores, that is, the Framingham score, are insufficient in risk prediction in this group of young individuals. In addition, a better understanding of the genetic aetiology of the FH phenotype and CHD risk in monogenic FH and polygenic hypercholesterolaemia is needed. Non-invasive imaging methods such as carotid intima-media thickness measurement might produce more reliable information in finding high-risk patients with FH. The potential market authorisation of novel therapeutic agents such as PCSK9 monoclonal inhibitors makes it essential to have a better screening programme to prioritise the candidates for treatment with the most severe form of FH and at higher risk of coronary events. The utility of new imaging techniques and new cardiovascular biomarkers remains to be determined in prospective trials

Assessment of the clinical utility of adding common single nucleotide polymorphism genetic scores to classical risk factor algorithms in coronary heart disease risk prediction in UK men

Background: Risk prediction algorithms for coronary heart disease (CHD) are recommended for clinical use. However, their predictive ability remains modest and the inclusion of genetic risk may improve their performance. Methods: QRISK2 was used to assess CHD risk using conventional risk factors (CRFs). The performance of a 19 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) gene score (GS) for CHD including variants identified by genome-wide association study and candidate gene studies (weighted using the results from the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D meta-analysis) was assessed using the second Northwick Park Heart Study (NPHSII) of 2775 healthy UK men (284 cases). To improve the GS, five SNPs with weak evidence of an association with CHD were removed and replaced with seven robustly associated SNPs – giving a 21-SNP GS. Results: The weighted 19 SNP GS was associated with lipid traits (p<0.05) and CHD after adjustment for CRFs, (OR=1.31 per standard deviation, p=0.03). Addition of the 19 SNP GS to QRISK2 showed improved discrimination (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.68 vs. 0.70 p=0.02), a positive net reclassification index (0.07, p=0.04) compared to QRISK2 alone and maintained good calibration (p=0.17). The 21-SNP GS was also associated with CHD after adjustment for CRFs (OR=1.39 per standard deviation, 1.42×10−3), but the combined QRISK2 plus GS score was poorly calibrated (p=0.03) and showed no improvement in discrimination (p=0.55) or reclassification (p=0.10) compared to QRISK2 alone. Conclusions: The 19-SNP GS is robustly associated with CHD and showed potential clinical utility in the UK population

Association of ACE and NOS3 Gene Polymorphisms with Blood Pressure in a Case Control Study of Coronary Artery Disease in Punjab, Pakistan

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), ACE rs4341 and NOS3 rs1799983 have been reported to be associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and blood pressure (BP)in many but not all studies. We aimed to investigate the effect of these SNPs on BP and CAD in people from Punjab, Pakistan. A total of 650 subjects (430 CAD cases and 220 controls) were genotyped by TaqMan/KASPar allelic discrimination technique. Two BP measurements were reordered and their mean was calculated. The results showed that the risk allele frequencies (RAFs) of both SNPs were higher in cases than controls but the difference was not statistically significant. For rs4341, RAF in cases and controls was 0.577 vs. 0.525, p = 0.08 and for rs1799983, the RAF was 0.202 vs. 0.178, p = 0.31. The SNPs were not associated with CAD. The CAD odds ratio of rs4341 (1.22,0.97-1.53, p = 0.09) and that of rs1799983 (1.15, 0.86-1.54, p=0.33) was not statistically significant. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were significantly higher in cases than controls (p<0.05) and the SNPs showed a significant association with BP. Each risk allele of rs4341 (G) increased SBP by 10.04±0.8 mmHg and DBP by 2.5±0.6mmHg, while risk allele of rs1799983 (T), increased SBP and DBP by 16.4±0.9mmHg and 8.8±0.6mmHg respectively, all were statistically significant (p<0.05). When a combined effect of genotypes of both SNPs was examined, a significant effect on CAD outcome (p=0.01) was observed when GG of rs4341 and GT of rs1799983 co-existed. Similarly, maximum elevation in BP was observed when risk alleles of both SNPs in homozygous form (GG and TT) appeared together. In conclusion, the SNPs were not independently associated with CAD but were associated with BP in Pakistani subjects under study and may be causing CAD by modulating BP